In January, the Library Company hosted the Philadelphia regional meeting of the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) featuring a slate of speakers representing some of the most influential thinking in digital preservation today. Storage of digital assets and their preservation is now a critical function of all GLAM institutions (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) and is a particularly pressing concern for small institutions trying to keep pace with increasing demands for digital content.
The NDSA Philly Regional meeting convened mid-Atlantic institutions to encourage new collaborations to meet the shared demands. Members of the Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries (PACSCL), PhillyDH, and the Delaware Valley Archivists Group (DVAG) were in attendance. The event was attended by almost 150 people and, scheduled on the cusp of the American Library Association Mid-Winter Conference, also drew attendees from as far as North Carolina, Florida, Colorado, and Washington.
The event was kicked off with a brief welcome by Library Company Director John Van Horne and an introduction by Erin Engle, Digital Archivist with the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program (NDIIPP) at the Library of Congress. Engle gave an overview of the NDSA’s structure and mission, emphasizing the organization’s advocacy on behalf of members and the resulting reports, guidance materials, meetings, events, and webinars. As an example, she cited the “2014 National Agenda for Digital Stewardship,” an insightful look into the current state of digital preservation, trends, and guidance for decision-makers and funders.
This was followed by a compelling keynote by Emily Gore, DPLA Director for Content, entitled “Building the Digital Public Library of America: Successes, Challenges and Future Directions.” The theme of sustainability emerged as she described the development of the DPLA and how it became clear that the hub model was the best strategy for the long-term success of the project. The establishment of hubs to aggregate content for DPLA will be more feasible than to attempt to manage the assets of innumerable individual institutions centrally. DPLA has tasked those repositories that wish to contribute content with the management of data aggregation, metadata consistency, continual repository services, promoting new digitization, encouraging community engagement, and self-evaluation for the improvement of existing and development of new DPLA hubs.
The keynote was followed by a series of lightning talks that focused on standards for preservation, digitization, and description. A comprehensive list of the issues that must be addressed in any collaborative digitization strategy emerged from these sessions; attendees agreed that consistency could ensure success where conformity was unattainable.
Meg Phillips, National Archives and Records Administration External Affairs Liaison, presented on NDSA Levels of Digital Preservation, “a tiered set of recommendations for how organizations should begin to build or enhance their digital preservation activities.” She emphasized the importance of this document as a tool for self-assessment, program planning, and institutional advocacy, and as a way to open communication with content creators. The success of the document lies in a simple descriptive format that is content-agnostic. It includes four levels of preservation—protect your data, know your data, monitor your data, and repair your data—across five functions: storage and geographic location, file fixity and data integrity, information security, metadata, and file formats.
Ian Bogus, MacDonald Curator of Preservation at the University of Pennsylvania Libraries, gave a talk entitled “Why Create a Standard on Digitization? An Experience Creating the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS) Minimum Digitization Capture Recommendation.” The goal of this project was to establish an acceptable minimum standard to ensure sustainability and viability into the future. The guiding principles of the project were to create a standard which was high enough to meet adequacy, in line with other recommendations and projects, basic enough for novices to use, and accurate enough for experts and did not duplicate existing work.
The evening concluded with a fun discussion on metadata, which nonetheless had serious undertones. George Blood of George Blood Audio|Video|Film discussed how we as librarians are “describing ourselves to death” and what he saw as “the failures of metadata.” He began by affirming that he is a metadata pessimist because no one asks “What problem are we trying to solve?” or “What are we trying to provide metadata for?” Most metadata is collected “just because we can” and because of this we do not test our metadata. The variety of metadata standards across and within institutions is staggering. Sometimes metadata standardization costs more than digitization itself. Blood encouraged the audience to consider what a standard is, whether a standard needs to be perfect, the implications of local modifications, and whether there is a one-size-fits-all solution.
For the next day’s “unconference,” approximately 50 attendees convened to propose and vote on sessions. The largest sessions included “Making the case for digital preservation,” “Let’s discuss a consortium data center,” and “How do we approach becoming a regional hub of DPLA?” The smaller breakout sessions included discussions on minimal standards for archival description, engaging leadership and encouraging organizational responsibility for digital projects, approaching rights and access issues, metrics for evaluation of digital archival resources, new technologies in digitization, and teaching digital preservation in library science and graduate archival programs. Notes from these sessions will be forthcoming on the event web page.
NDSA Regional meetings offer opportunities for local institutions to connect with one another and become informed on national trends in digital stewardship, moving beyond their community and regional concerns to consider and strategize the digital preservation of our nation’s cultural heritage.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
Other cookies
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!